Tag Archives: triangles

ACT Question of the Day Explained – January 26, 2014 – Geometry, Right Triangles

Today’s ACT question of the day is a repeat of the question we just saw on January 22 about applying the Pythagorean theorem and simplifying radical expressions.

Instead of going over it again, let’s take a moment to remember at least one Pythagorean triplet (3, 4, 5 – a great time save on test day if you know how to apply it).

And, for practice, simplifying another radical expression:

√108 = √(9 * 12 ) = (9 * 4 * 3) = 3√(4 * 3) = 6√3

Check:
6^2 = 36
36 * 3 = 108

ACT Question of the Day Explained – January 18, 2014 – Geometry, Triangles

isosceles-rainbowToday’s ACT question of the day is almost too easy to explain.  We are given an isosceles triangle, drawn to scale, and the measure of the third angle (the one without a corresponding angle): 22 degrees.

Isosceles triangles have two congruent angles and two congruent sides.  There are 180 degrees inside a triangle.  If you keep those two ideas in mind, you will have this problem solved before I can even finish explaining.

Continue reading

ACT Question of the Day Explained – January 14, 2014 – Geometry, Isosceles Triangles

isosceles-heightToday’s ACT question of the day involves a triangle with two equal sides. Triangles with two equal sides (and, therefore, two equal angles) are isosceles triangles. This is a key observation to make before taking on this problem.

We have an isosceles triangle with only a base (length of 10). The height has been drawn in, bisecting the third angle and meeting the base at a right angle, but we don’t know its length. It would be nice if we did, right? Area of a triangle = 1/2 • base • height.

If we knew any of the angle measures, maybe we could luck out and find a 45-45-90 or 30-60-90 triangle somewhere in the diagram. We could also be sharp and recall one of our Pythagorean triplets: 3, 4, 5. Unfortunately, we don’t have any facts to support those guesses. We do have answer choices that work if you make those spurious assumptions, so be careful! Don’t make things up just to make the problem seem easier.

We could try to use trigonometry creatively to derive the hypotenuse, then work backward to find the height. Unfortunately, cos90 = 0, so that ends right there. If we knew the angle at the top of the triangle, we could use the sin of that angle • half the square of the length of one of the equal sides to find the area (works for all isosceles triangles)…but we have neither measure. What now?

Continue reading